Urgent Call to Action
The Dangers of Trans-nationalist Samantha Power Representing the US at the UN are NOT to be IGNORED
Under the tyrannical reign of Barrack Hussein Obama, America is rapidly being de-constructed. Obama works 24/7 to diminish the American ‘brand and Samantha Power is one more GIANT Step in the continued pursuit of the DECONSTRUCTION of this once glorious Republic. Power considers the United States to be an Imperialist Beast that must be knocked down, made weak, limp in the eyes of the world ‘s dictators. She is just the person Obama needs to represent HIM in the United Nations
Samantha Power is not now nor will she EVER be a great Patriot as in former UN Ambassador, John Bolton. Bolton’s wisdom and patriotism is already sorely missed but will be even more so if Samantha Power is appointed as United Nations Ambassador from the U.S.
And don’t count on our yellow-media to expose her. It is up to us, AMERICA, to say ENOUGH and to STOP her appointment to the United Nations.
Remember, The Senate has to approve the nomination.
Continue to target Senators, most importantly GOP on Senate Foreign Relations Committee: Mr. Corker, Mr. Risch, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Flake, Mr. McCain, Mr. Barrasso, and Mr. Paul
- Use July 4 holiday as a backdrop to draw a sharp distinction between traditional US foreign policy for 237 years and what Power represents!
Senators like Ted Cruz oppose Power for solid reasons of LOGIC.
Samantha Power is one of most extreme radical leftists in the Obama administration
http://uc4i.org/notopower – Please share this video and this action page. We must demand the Congress says, “No To Power!” – US Congressional Switchboard – (202) 224-3121
Samantha Power is against western interests
She supports the UN having a Standing Army.
She supports the Cairo Declaration on “Human Rights”
Samantha Power supports Sharia Law!
Samantha Power – Trans-Nationalist
STOP HER NOMINATION. Take Action. NOW!
The following provides full text and quotes from Samantha Power on a variety of subjects to support our position on Samantha Power’s unsuitability for the position of UN Ambassador…
In 2002 interview with Harry Kreisler:
In a ‘Conversations with History’ interview at University of California at Berkeley, Power, responded to a hypothetical question on a scenario in which the U.S. must “install some mechanism” to prevent the possibility of genocide in the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
She was asked, “Let me give you a thought experiment…let’s say you were an advisor to the President of the United States, how would you respond to current events there? Would you advise him to put a structure in place to monitor that situation, at least if one party or another [starts] looking like they might be moving toward genocide?”
This was a excerpt from Power’s response: Power said that her advice to the President would be to 1) “Alienate” the American Jewish community, and indeed all Americans, such as evangelical Christians, who support the state of Israel, because 2) Israeli leaders are “destroying the lives of their own people.” 3) Pour billions of dollars of the taxpayers’ money into “the new state of Palestine”; 4) Stage an American ground invasion of Israel and the Palestinian territories — what else can she mean by a “mammoth protection force” and a “military presence” that will be “imposed” by “external intervention”? — in order to do the exact same thing that she considers the height of arrogance and foolishness in Iraq: an American campaign to remake an Arab society.
The Case Against Her Appointment as
US Ambassador to the United Nations.
Samantha Power, President Barack Obama’s choice to fill the position of 28th US Ambassador to the United Nations, has built her reputation as a staunch and vocal advocate for “humanitarian intervention”, particularly where genocide is the likely result of non-intervention. She is the self-styled “genocide chick”.
She has been widely criticized, however, for the solutions that she espouses, which have been called “answering a ‘problem from hell’ with a ‘solution from hell.’. She is also widely believed to support an anti-Israel agenda as part of her overall view of a globalized integration of American law and values. This is a view demonstrated by a largely consistent body of statements over more than a decade.
Power’s Role in the Obama Administration and Intervention in Libya and Syria.
When President Obama led the United States into a coalition of forces against Libya, the person behind that decision was understood to be Samantha Power. The decision was strongly influenced by her doctrine of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) that purported to guide the American government on how to prevent genocide. The concept is being promoted to create a new international model based on ‘moral’ criteria, that can be employed in situations where the safety of civilians is at risk.
Yet, on the very first night of the coalition’s enforcement of a “no-fly zone” over Libya, US forces rained 1,100 missiles down on Tripoli. It brought death and destruction to an unprecedented level for a “humanitarian” effort, in a nation in which the US had no strategic interest.
According to John Podhoretz’s account of the “contentious” meeting at which the President decided to “move on Libya”, it was Power’s concept of R2P and not any concern for our national interest, that influenced the decision.
It should be noted that this intervention was in response to Libyan leader Muammar Ghadaffi’s threat of revenge against dissidents. Although there was certainly fighting on the ground in Benghazi and other places, there was no wholesale genocide taking place in Libya at the time the decision to engage was taken.
In stark contrast, the Administration has refused, for the last two years, to act openly in Syria, even after tens of thousands of civilians were killed in the rapidly escalating conflict.
Even after we had all known for several months that chemical weapons were now at play in Syria, US policy was to remain publicly uninvolved. Perhaps the concept of “humanitarian intervention” only applies where it is politically expedient and safe.
Meanwhile, Samantha Power was appointed head of the do-nothing Atrocities Prevention Board, set up by the President in 2012…
But while the growing list of atrocities being committed against Syrian civilians continued to bring the death toll ever higher, the APB did nothing. It is difficult to understand how Power’s commitment to R2D did not make Syria her most urgent priority.
To date, some 93,000 men, women, and children have died in Syria, according to the latest UN estimates. Yet even today, this “budget neutral” board still has no office, no web site, no phone, no public record of actions it has taken, nor has it issued a single public statement relating to the increasingly desperate plight of Syrian civilians, who themselves are facing genocide at the hands of both the Assad government and the terrorist elements within the opposition.
…. it should give the Senate serious pause as they consider her appointment.
The implications of her off-the-cuff remarks suggest that she believes 1) that either side was capable of genocide, 2) that there was a clear moral equivalence between the two leaders, 3) that US support for a Palestinian state should include massive US funding for a Palestinian defense force, at the expense of funds now going to Israel for its own defense, and 4) that Israel was incapable of handling its own affairs vis à vis the Palestinians, and the only solution, therefore, was international intervention in the affairs of a sovereign state.
When concerns arose in 2008 regarding Barack Obama and his views towards Israel it generated wrath from Ms. Power, who was a key foreign policy adviser to candidate Obama. She let loose in a radio interview while in Europe, “So much of it is about: ‘Is he going to be good for the Jews?”
We care too much about whether it is good for the Jews
Sean Hannity isn’t the only conservative commentator who has put in his two cents on Power. Glenn Beck has said:
For anyone who thinks that Samantha Power is just some low level cog in the Washington machine, the New York Times just did a nice profile on her role in the current administration. It turns out that Mrs. Cass Sunstein is probably the most dangerous woman in America, after all.
Urgent Call to Action
REACH OUT TO YOUR SENATORS NOW. The Senate has to approve the nomination WHICH IS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF JULY 15, 2013
Find your senator on this link: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Please send this message to your Senator and forward to your e-mail contacts.
As you know, President Obama has declared his intention to nominate Samantha Power to be the next U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations. In light of her low regard for our country, her animus towards one of our most important allies, Israel, and her affinity for those who would diminish our sovereignty and strengthen our adversaries, we consider her to be a wholly unacceptable choice for this sensitive post and urge you to reject this nomination.
Of course, almost since its inception, the United Nations has been dominated by member states, organizations and personalities who share Dr. Power’s sentiments. We do not need to add to their number – especially as the representative of the American people – someone who shares their transnationalist agenda, with all that implies for our interests and freedoms.
That is particularly the case at this moment in history. Freedom-loving nations are under assault – arguably as never before – from totalitarian adversaries, Islamist ideologues, terrorist groups and other enemies. Such foes have found legitimacy and sustenance in the United Nations. And their agendas are routinely adopted as the agendas of this so-called “world body,” rather than ones that are actually in the interest of our country and allies.
Now, more than ever, the United States needs to return to the kind of UN representation it has enjoyed in the past with prominent figures from both parties, like Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Jeanne Kirkpatrick and John Bolton. They loved and admired our nation, exulted in its exceptionalism and courageously defended it against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They were under no illusions about the United Nations and routinely challenged efforts to increase its influence and power at American expense. Samantha Power’s decades-long track record makes clear that she neither embraces these principles nor is disposed to play this important role in advancing them.
We urge you in the strongest of terms to ensure that we are once again represented at the UN by a great American, not someone like Samantha Power who reviles America’s greatness.